Tag Archives: graduate students

Eats and Attractions near the Convention

There are plenty of coffee shops and eateries near the MLA 2019 convention.

Following is a variety of budget-friendly options (variably priced from $ to $$). This list is not an endorsement of any particular place, rather it is a compilation of places nearby to the convention. Local-to-Chicago options have embedded links to their website.

 

Coffee 

Peet’s Coffee ($) (400 Michigan Avenue #120)

Starbucks ($$) (333 Michigan Avenue and 444 N Michigan Ave)

Dunkin’ Donuts ($) (404 N Wabash Ave)

Stan’s Donuts & Coffee ($) (535 N Michigan Ave)

Caffé Rom (180 N Stetson Ave #107)

 

Food

Café

Corner Bakery Café ($$) (444 N Michigan Ave)

Wildberry Pancakes and Café ($$) (130 E Randolph St)

 

Sandwiches

Snarf’s Sandwiches ($) (180 N Stetson Ave)

Jersey Mike’s Subs ($) (203 E Ohio St)

Yolk Streeterville ($$) (355 E Ohio St)

 

Fast Food

McDonald’s ($) (233 N Michigan)

Chick-fil-A ($) (177 N State St #1a)

 

Health

LYFE Kitchen ($) (270 E Ontario St)

 

Restaurants and Taverns

Billy Goat Tavern ($) (430 N Michigan Ave)

Beacon Tavern ($$) (405 N Wabash Ave)

Giordano’s ($$) (130 E Randolph St)

Coco Pazzo Café ($$) (212 E Ohio St)

 

Grocery

Trader Joe’s (44 E Ontario St)

 

Popular Attractions 

Lastly, here are a few popular destinations within reasonable distance from the convention:

Navy Pier (600 E Grand Ave)

Chicago Water Tower (806 Michigan Avenue)

Chicago Cultural Center (78 E Washington St)

American Writers Museum (180 N Michigan Ave)

Track Changes: Dissertation Writing Groups

Thinking about starting the new academic year as part of a writing group? These communities can offer a lot during the process of writing a dissertation: different readers might point out unclear aspects of an argument you have taken for granted, or let you know how your work resonates with research in another discipline; peers keep you accountable in the intervals between consultation with advisors; and of course, meeting regularly with friends leavens the isolation of long hours spent reading, coding, and revising.

If you are looking to start or join a writing group, check out a few guides and reflections, such as:

While completing my dissertation, I participated in two writing groups. Each varied in size, followed distinct organizational patterns, and impacted my work in different—but equally vital—ways. Group 1 comprised just 3 members. We met once a month, giving detailed feedback on one person’s pre-circulated chapter. By the time we went to the job market, we knew each other’s work quite well, and changed our regular meeting schedule to include practice interviews and job talks. Group 2 comprised 5 members. We were looking for a bit more accountability in our writing during the summer months, so we agreed on a rotating schedule in which we each had to send a short sample of new or revised writing (up to 5 pages) to another group member on Fridays. When the academic year became more intense, we shifted these incremental exchanges to a schedule like that of Group 1. Still, we maintained our focus on accountability by holding interim meetings where we simply caught up on each other’s projects.

Based on these experiences, I’ve come up with few thoughts on successful and meaningful work in a writing group:

1. Don’t wait

I was just drafting my prospectus when two friends invited me to join them in Group 1. I was hesitant, thinking that I simply didn’t have enough material yet. Still, I said yes and sent around the prospectus for comment. The detailed—and difficult—responses from my friends both prepared me for my prospectus colloquium and had a formative impact on my project.

2. Organize the feedback you receive

If I sent my writing group, say, a 25-page chapter section, I would likely receive back (1) a page of overall comments, (2) a copy of my file with a more specific inline notes, and (3) additional spoken points during our meeting. Implementing feedback requires a system, so decide early how you will organize these notes.

3. Cultivate the art of the response

Articulating clear questions and productive comments are skills that translate across and beyond academia. Reflect on how you go about critiquing the work of your peers, and hone these skills for use in the classroom, the conference room, and everywhere else.

Chasing Data: Creating a Graduate Student Survey

The University of Arkansas’s Graduate Students in English (GSE) recently used the CSGSP’s “Improving Institutional Circumstances for Graduate Students in Languages and Literatures: Recommendations for Best Practices and Evaluative Questions” to create a survey that gauged the climate and concerns of its department’s graduate students. The GSE then used those results to advocate for a hybrid committee:

The Committee will address some of the trends and concerns raised by the GSE’s inaugural survey, including devising and implementing new graduate program protocols.

Read more about this work by the GSE in this post, authored by Megan Vallowe and Christy Davis.

Grad School Summers: How Going “Off Track” Showed Me the Way

by Geffrey Davis, University of Arkansas

Hear me out. I want to suggest that, if you can afford it, if you can gain your advisor’s approval, if you can set the appropriate academic smokescreens, consider going “off track” this summer. I can’t emphasize enough my abiding sense that, by allowing myself to go “off track” during my summers, I left grad school with a greater level of institutional literacy, a more robust network, a more diverse set of professional skills and experience, and a healthier survey of my post-graduation horizons.

By “off track,” I mean to invoke paid (or unpaid, if you can swing it and it’s worth your time) positions that are neither required nor provided by your graduate program. More specifically, however, I’m recommending (especially if you teach throughout the 9-month academic year) that you change things up and gain some alt-ac experience by committing your summer to something(s) beyond the sanctioned scope of your advanced degree program.

In many ways, for academics, mid-May to mid-August are our cruelest months. We pick up as many sections of composition or language courses as necessary to float us financially until the fall paychecks return. Or we relish (mistakenly) in the theoretical abundance of “free” time we have to solve the critical problems threatening what’s viable (or feasible) about our thesis/dissertation projects. And yet, here’s the harsh reality: we rarely get as much work done over the summer as we imagine and/or need. And so, adding insult to injury, we often enter fall semesters feeling both inadequately recharged and rottenly weighted down by all the work we have failed to complete—sometimes quite literally, if we have also tried to fit in a family visit with book-packed suitcases.

Even if we must work during summers, summers don’t have to work like this. I learned this by accident. My first summer as a graduate student—both to sharpen my understanding of grad school (as a first generation student) and to strengthen my pedagogical chops—I stayed in-town and taught composition, and I have no regrets about that decision. My second summer, however, an alternative opportunity came across my desk when our Director of Graduate Studies recommended that I apply for an open position with the Summer Institute for Literary and Cultural Studies (SILCS). Still drawn to the idea of evolving my teaching strengths, I nearly ignored the call. But when I looked more carefully into SILCS—and, especially, when I realized its commitment to addressing a history of ethnic/racial underrepresentation by providing a cohort of minority undergraduate students with vital academic resources and training in literary and cultural theory—I scrambled to gather the necessary job materials, applied, and was offered a residency position as a graduate mentor.

That summer, rather than double down on the valuable training (as a teacher and a scholar) that my grad program was already providing, I spent the month of June engaging a diverse group of undergrad students in a new capacity, working alongside programmers and administrators, and networking with a range of academics from across the country. Furthermore, that experience gave me alt-ac skills and insight that simultaneously broadened my professional vision and yet deepened my sense of the academic structure to which I was committed as a graduate student. I never used my summers the same.

After returning from SILCS, I began realizing year-round “off track” opportunities that were lower commitment but similarly rewarding: I said yes to formal on-campus mentoring of underrepresented undergraduates, to outreach work within my local community, to summer creative writing retreats, and to less traditional summer teaching positions (for graduate students). For starters, I recommend that you visit your home institution’s Career Services to learn about all the summer jobs, fellowships, and internships offered on your campus. You should find out whether your university or college participates in the Upward Bound/Migrant Program. It’s also worth considering residency positions offered at other institutions, such as Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Talented Youth. If your institution offers graduate level internships (such as Penn State University’s GRIP program), you might consider that option. Finally, I’d keep an eye out for freelance gigs or positions with short-term funding via supplemental pay at your home institution.

Though I understand the real concerns and risks involved with spreading one’s self in this manner, my “off track” activities did not force me to forfeit the timely completion of my advanced degrees or compromise my ability to become an effective college-level teacher—both of which were extremely important goals of mine. Each experience did, however, help me evolve and advance my post-graduation prospects.

By the time I completed grad school, I had a rich professional network (both inside and outside of academia), a more developed institutional literacy, additional administrative and service skills (as necessary for administration or activism as for successful committee work), an ability to communicate to a broader audience (extremely important for grants, job docs, and interviews), a more informed and nuanced perspective on my professional and personal goals, and a refreshed interest in my academic work—not to mention a counter-force to both the pressures of an advanced degree program and the reality of job market uncertainties. As such, I encourage you to break the cycle as a graduate student by using summers to go “off track” in order to gain unique leadership, service, and communication experience.